 |
|
 |
|
|
This section describes research, documents, and reports related to indirect effects/cumulative impacts. If you would like to suggest additional research, documents, or reports on this topic, please submit a short description to AASHTO (including any pertinent links) on the Share Info with AASHTO form.
|
|
|
| |
| Federal Highway Administration |
|
- California
- Colorado
- Florida
- Maryland
- North Carolina
- Oregon
- Texas
- Wisconsin
[back to top] | | | |
|
| Transportation Research Board |
|
- PB’s Highway Sustainability Checklist [ZIP] NEW - This checklist was selected by AASHTO as the winning U.S. entry in the Sustainable Development category for the 2007 World Road Association’s (PIARC) International Competition. The checklist was developed in response to growing interest in an objective, non-prescriptive, broad-based tool that would support the integration of environmental stewardship practices and CSS into day-to-day highway-related practices. The checklist is a compendium of possible measures associated with various phases of highway projects—from planning to design, through construction, operations and maintenance. It is meant to facilitate decisions about the extent to which highway improvements might incorporate measures that go beyond satisfying minimum functional requirements by addressing contextual factors which contribute to sustainability of the natural, built, and human environments. The checklist is flexible and may be adapted to individual agencies or specific project applications. (December 2007)
- Annotated Bibliography on Cumulative Impact Analysis, Midwest Natural Resources Group (2004)
- Executive Order 13274 Indirect and Cumulative Impacts Work Group, Draft Baseline Report (March 15, 2005)
- Recent Trends in Cumulative Impact Case Law, Michael D. Smith (2005)
A Systematic but Not-Too-Complicated Approach to Cumulative Effects Assessment, Robert Senner, et. al.
[back to top] | | | |
|
|
|
