Comprehensive Wildlife Crossing Research Initiative

Focus Area

Wildlife & Ecosystems

Subcommittee

Natural Resources

Status

Archived

Cost

$500,000-$750,000

Timeframe

Over 3 years

Research Idea Scope

Over the last decade, natural resource agencies and transportation agencies have become
increasingly aware of the effects that highway and railroad systems have on wildlife. Habitat
loss and fragmentation are the two leading causes of wildlife loss and extirpation. Fragmented
wildlife habitats have a lower capability to sustain wildlife populations than large, interconnected
habitats. The cumulative effects of highways on wildlife have been serious habitat
fragmentation, wildlife mortality, loss of habitat, avoidance of otherwise suitable habitat by
wildlife, increases in human activities, and the use of rural lands that support wildlife. Much of
this impact can be avoided or minimized by state-of-the-art wildlife crossings and other
mitigation.

TERI Administrator Note (June 2007): Research Completed

Montana State University, Bozeman; Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating North American Wildlife Crossing Systems (2005)

The objective of this research project is to provide transportation professionals with the best available information and current technologies on wildlife crossing systems for transportation projects. Effective wildlife fencing and crossing structures can significantly reduce many harmful impacts of roads on wildlife populations. Yet currently there is limited knowledge of how to incorporate these structures for most wildlife species into transportation projects. For example, studies have shown that wildlife use crossing structures, but level of use varies between species of wildlife, locations and landscapes, and the reasons why are unclear. Recommended minimum dimensions have been suggested for some ungulate species, but the needs of wide-ranging species are vague at best. Human activity can significantly influence how wildlife use structures. Others have inferred that crossing structure location, particularly in relation to habitat quality, might be the most important design feature of successful wildlife crossing structure applications. In spite of these valuable kernels of information, gaping holes in our knowledge of functional wildlife passage systems remain. Practically all of the performance evaluations to date have focused on single-species and limited attention has been paid to multiple-species relationships. After nearly a decade of increased activity building crossing structures, engineers and land managers still lack guiding principles as a large void exists in devising functional designs based on criteria that are relevant to real management decisions. It is timely to conduct a critical assessment of the current status of these mitigation measures and experience in an adaptive management process. A growing body of literature and information base has resulted from nearly a decade or more of increased implementation of wildlife crossing systems in North America. This project serves as the first attempt to gather, review and critically analyze current information on ecological criteria and design attributes of wildlife crossing structure planning and performance. We will obtain data on specific passage use from reports in journals, conference proceedings, in-house technical reports and informal contacts with colleagues.

Two connected phases of research are proposed: the first addressing where wildlife crossings
should be located at a fine scale based on wildlife behavior and movement patterns, terrain,
habitat characteristics, and characteristics of the transportation corridor; and the second what
types of structures are most effective for representative wildlife.

The following should be considered when addressing where wildlife crossings should be
located for representative wildlife species:

  • Address how movement patterns of representative species react to highways, wildlife crossings, and related infrastructures, and how topography, habitat character, and the transportation corridors affect wildlife reactions. Many aspects need clarification, including the effects of traffic noise, traffic volume, and traffic speed on wildlife behavior.
  • Assess how terrain and habitat features enhance or detract from the use of wildlife crossings and associated linkage areas. What are the most effective terrain and habitat characteristics to identify when placing crossings and linkage zones for representative species and multiple species?

The following studies should be conducted to determine what types of structures are most
effective for representative wildlife species:

  • What types of wildlife crossing structures are best for representative species such as deer, elk, small mammals, reptiles, and amphibians?
  • What are the best structures for multiple species?
  • How effective are existing structures in promoting wildlife crossings?
  • What are the most cost-effective designs?
  • How can existing crossings such as bridges and culverts be modified to facilitate wildlife movement?
  • What are design elements that generally enhance wildlife use of structures such as fencing, natural light, and opening size?

TERI Administrator’s Note – Related Research

A featured article in the March-April 2007 issue of TR News http://www.trb.org/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=7668) explores Banff  National Park in Alberta, Canada, which has been a testing site for  innovative passageways to mitigate the effects of roads on wildlife.  The Trans-Canada Highway bisects the park, but a range of engineering mitigation measures—including a variety of wildlife underpasses and overpasses—has helped maintain large mammal populations for the past 25 years and has allowed the gathering of valuable data about wildlife crossing structures.

Suggested By

Transportation Research Board 2002 Environmental Research Needs Conference Notes

[email protected]

Submitted

05/15/2006